On Thu, February 16, 2006 9:45 am, Niall Pemberton said:
> My view is that this is "security hole" that we are fixing, not adding
> a new feature. I also think that the original RequestProcessor and
> TilesRequestProcessor offer people a way of upgrading to 1.3 and use
> tried and tested code - without having to adopt the CoR
> implementation.
>
> Since I have implemented the Cancellable behaviour in the 1.2.x
> branch, then either it needs also applying to the 1.3 branch or that
> change needs to be reversed.
>
> We probably should release a Struts 1.2.9 to fix this issue and the
> "DOS attack" issue and I am willing to do that - probably have time in
> a couple of weeks.

+1 to Niall's comments, and therefore a non-binding -1 to tagging the
repository... I don't see the point in even simply tagging if there are
two outstanding security issues.

By the way, I didn't catch the DOS hole... can someone point me at the
appropriate ticket?

> Niall

Frank

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to