On 2/16/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/16/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Its down to whether you're hoping 1.3.0 makes "GA" quality or not. If > > we want to give it a chance of "GA" then we should fix them now. If we > > just want to get a milestone out there then carry on. I don't mind > > either way. > > In six years, we've never had a new minor version make GA on the first > release. The 1.2 series came close, we made GA in three tries. The 1.1 > series took three betas and a release candidate. I don't expect that > 1.3 would be much different.
Same even on 1.0 ... it took two point releases to get it right. -Ted. Craig
