On 3/25/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm in favor of either, and in fact, I've already repackaged the code > under org.apache.struts.action2, so if I had to pick, I'd pick the one > that doesn't have me duplicating work :)
Me too (in favor of either), but the fact that several developers whose original package name is getting changed favor the second makes me lean that way also. +0 for option 2. Don Craig Ted Husted wrote: > > STATUS so far > > > > - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.ti > > - WebWork* classes -> Struts* > > - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 > > - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. > > - ww: tag prefix -> a: > > > > +1 Don Brown, Martin Cooper (binding) > > +1 Frank Zammetti (non-binding) > > > > - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.action2 > > - WebWork* classes -> Struts* > > - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 > > - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. > > - ww: tag prefix -> a:/saf: > > > > +1 Rainer Hermanns, Ted Husted, Alexandru Popescu, Rene Gielen (binding) > > +0 Toby Jee, Hubert Rabago (binding) > > +1 Paul Benedict (non-binding) > > > > If I've left any votes out, or gotten any of the votes wrong, be sure > > to chime in! > > > > -Ted. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
