On 3/25/06, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think there's something here. Certainly, Gabe articulates my > dissatisfaction with action2 -- it is possible to imagine a > revolution from Struts 2 to Struts 3 which does not require > completely reorganizing the package structure, but if there's an > "action2" package lying around, that would be pretty awkward.
Another suggestion that was made some time ago would be to use * org.apache.action for the package name, as we did for Shale. And I don't have a problem with org.apache.webwork either. In my mind it's really a matter of what Alexandru, Rene, Rainer, Toby, Ian, Patrick, and Jason want to do. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
