> I think there's something here. Certainly, Gabe articulates my > dissatisfaction with action2 -- it is possible to imagine a > revolution from Struts 2 to Struts 3 which does not require > completely reorganizing the package structure, but if there's an > "action2" package lying around, that would be pretty awkward.
I considered this myself. I thought how odd it would be to be in use action 3.0 while there's an "action2" lying around, but then I resolved it internally for myself. I look at the architecture at being why it's called action2; I don't have a problem with action2 even in 3.0 if it is continuing to use the 2.0 architecture. Now if you were to break that, then an action3 would be justified. Paul __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
