I agree with Don and Paul. The webwork as dear to us as it may be should be excised.
----- Original Message ---- From: Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Struts Developers List <dev@struts.apache.org> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 3:55:50 PM Subject: Re: WebWork renaming strategy *revised* I am +1 with Don. If this community wants the name webwork, then I believe this incubation shouldn't become Struts 2.0 -- because names are well-established out there and it's awkward to say it's Struts although the packages are webwork; you might as well just make it Apache WebWork and allow Action 2.0 to come from another source base... but I don't think anyone wants to seriously do that ;) The ball is rolling, so I recommend to "excise" the name WW from the product (in favor of "action2") unless you want to call it WW 2.3. -- Paul --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we used the 'webwork' name in the package, I think we should abandon the > idea of this being > the second major version > of Action. In my opinion, a project needs to have a name, a single name, > which one uses to > identify it. If we want to > bring WebWork in as a new Struts subproject, and that is an option, then I'm > fine with that. > However, I'm not OK with > mixing webwork in with Action in with Struts. We need to make a decision, > then move on. > > Don > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > +1 to webwork - "org.apache.webwork" if thats allowed, otherwise > > "org.apache.struts.webwork". > > > > Niall > > > > On 3/27/06, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hey there, > >> > >> if webwork is an option as well, I would vote for org.apache.webwork :) > >> > >> The tag prefix ui: won't be my choice... There are plenty of non-ui tags > >> within webwork. So this would result in something like: ui:/nonui: and > >> this would be quite annoying for me... > >> Same with html: prefix... Yes, some are html tags, but others are not... > >> > >> So we would have to go the logic:, bean: and html: route... > >> Too much confusion... > >> > >> Still my favourites are saf: or a: (and being sometimes lazy, ww: of > >> course :) ) > >> > >> cheers, > >> Rainer > >> > >> PS: Can't we decide on this later if there is no consens now? > >> Since this is a simple refactoring with subversion it should not hold up > >> the incubation process for now... > >> > >>>> - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.action2 > >>>> - WebWork* classes -> Struts* > >>>> - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 > >>>> - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. > >>>> - ww: tag prefix -> a:/saf: > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> I would also be +1 to: > >>> - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.webwork or > >>> org.apache.webwork > >>> - ww: tag prefix -> ui: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> James Mitchell > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mar 25, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Ted Husted wrote: > >>> > >>>> STATUS so far > >>>> > >>>> - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.ti > >>>> - WebWork* classes -> Struts* > >>>> - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 > >>>> - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. > >>>> - ww: tag prefix -> a: > >>>> > >>>> +1 Don Brown, Martin Cooper (binding) > >>>> +1 Frank Zammetti (non-binding) > >>>> > >>>> - com.opensymphony.webwork package -> org.apache.struts.action2 > >>>> - WebWork* classes -> Struts* > >>>> - WebWork in comments, documentation -> Struts Action 2 > >>>> - webwork. as the configuration properties prefix -> struts. > >>>> - ww: tag prefix -> a:/saf: > >>>> > >>>> +1 Rainer Hermanns, Ted Husted, Alexandru Popescu, Rene Gielen > >>>> (binding) > >>>> +0 Toby Jee, Hubert Rabago (binding) > >>>> +1 Paul Benedict (non-binding) > >>>> > >>>> If I've left any votes out, or gotten any of the votes wrong, be sure > >>>> to chime in! > >>>> > >>>> -Ted. > >>>> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
