I vote for "struts-action.xml". Bob
On 4/19/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We might want to keep a straight-line mapping in the naming conventions, where > > OpenSymphony -> Apache Struts > WebWork -> Action > > A good reason to prefer "action-default.xml" to "struts-default.xml" > is that we want people to be able to use Struts Action 1 and Struts > Action 2 in the same application space. We already have a > "struts-config.xml". While these file names don't actually conflict, > it might be clearer to name the new configurations "action" rather > than "struts" to avoid confusion. > > So, I would suggest that we use "action-default.xml", and any place > where we've started to say "struts", we might consider saying > "action", so as to avoid confusion and conflict with Struts Action 1. > > -Ted. > > On 4/19/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Patrick Lightbody wrote: > > > We can definitely start by reading "struts.xml" rather than "xwork.xml". > > > > +1, works great with struts-default.xml > > > > Don > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]