On 4/23/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The end goal is a standalone Tiles in the Jakarta Web Commons project > (to be created), then Struts Action 1 would have a struts-tiles artifact > which makes it possible for Struts users to use this standalone Tiles. > Think of it how Struts Scripting works or Struts validator. In the > meantime, we'd put the Struts Tiles project, which isn't standalone, > back into Action until we can replace the core of it with a new > dependency on the new Standalone Tiles. > > Did I get that right? :)
Yep. Except I think the target name is 'Jakarta Web Components'. -- Martin Cooper Don > > Frank W. Zammetti wrote: > > Doesn't that conflict with the idea of making Tiles a stand-alone TLP? > > > > Frank > > > > Don Brown wrote: > >> I'm fine with this solution, as long as my original concern of a > >> circular dependency is resolved. > >> > >> Don > >> > >> Wendy Smoak wrote: > >>> On 4/23/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> I'm in the same camp on this one. I think we (SAF1) should be > >>>> providing a plugin that provides Tiles integration. > >>>> > >>> > >>> In that case, should Struts Tiles be put back under Struts Action? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Wendy > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
