On 6/30/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(from the peanut gallery)
How about:
repos/asf/struts/branches/struts-1.3/...
repos/asf/struts/trunk (2.0, 2.1, 3.0 goes here)
Yep, and different teams have tried different approaches :)
Maven has maven-1 under the root
* http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/
Tapestry has Tapestry# folders for each series
* http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tapestry/
And, as mentioned, HTTPD uses branches
* http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/
Given the infrastructure we already haven in place, the "Tapestry"
approach would make the most sense, since that's what we are already
using.
Before just renaming the framework from "Action" to "Struts", without
discussion, we opened this thread to be sure all the committers were
good with that. And, it seems that we are.
Now, in place of "Tapestry4" and "Tapestry5". we now have
"struts-action" and "struts-action2"
* http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/struts/
which we could just rename to "struts1" and "struts2".
I was just asking if we wanted to make the reference "s1" and "s2".
(The Maven team shortens their version references to m1 and m2, and I
wondered if we wanted to reinforce that convention.)
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
