On 8/18/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I understand both your concerns... But I don't believe it has to be the
policy that we cannot advertise beta releases on the main page too.


Please be careful with the terminology. There is no such thing as a "beta
release".

1.3.5 is the latest (not the greatest with no GA) but we still have a link
to 1.2.x, why? It is kind of silly to a dead branch (there will be no more
1.2) but are unsure to advertise the 1.3.5. If the side bar simply said "
1.3.5 (beta)", people could find it right on the home page and not be
confused of its status.

Other apache projects (including tapestry and httpd) advertise their beta
projects on the home page, so why can't we?


To quote Wendy: "we could mention it on the front page".

And your problem with that, again, was...? ;-)

--
Martin Cooper


Paul

Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/18/06, Paul Benedict
wrote:

> Will 1.3.5 appear on the side bar?

Not until it's a GA release, but we could mention it on the front page
below the 1.2.9 section.

It is already on the mirrors, in ibiblio, and on the downloads page.

If wider distribution doesn't turn anything else up, in a couple of
weeks we can consider promoting 1.3.5 to GA status.

--
Wendy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------
Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com.  Check it out.

Reply via email to