On 8/18/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I ask: why is 1.2.x given preference (a version without a label or vote), but not 1.3.5 (versioned and voted)?
First, 1.3.x is given preference, since 1.3.x is the top-level website. We have a link to 1.2.x because is *not* the head, it's a branch. We had the link to 1.2.x because both the 1.2.x branch and the 1.3.x head were under active development. It takes time before we know whether development on a branch has petered out. If someone wants to remove it now, I would have no complaint. Though, we never actually declare any of the branches "dead". If someone wanted to go back and do a 1.1.1 release to add the cancel hack, there's nothing to prevent that (except motivation). Or, if someone wanted to roll a 1.2.10 to fix something for some reason, again the only thing preventing that is a willing volunteer. -Ted. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
