I tried to upload a war file that demonstrates the problem that I am
having, but it is just too large at 2.25MB and the qmail-send program is
rejecting it. I iterated and tried to remove every unnecessary jar that
I could and this is the best I could shrink it down to based upon my
webapp knowledge. So I have uploaded the file to our ftp site. I would
prefer to send the login information directly to you versus publishing
it publicly, since I don't have an anonymous ftp site right now. Can you
provide a more secure location where I can send you the login information?

I have only tried a snapshot from the beginning of the
month---02Sep2006---and the problem existed in that snapshot and a
snapshot from 12Sep2006 in addition to the snapshot from today. I have
upgraded the tiles-defs.xml file to use the 2.0 DTD with, as you might
expect, no change to the results. I have uploaded the new smaller war
with the new 2.0 DTD to the same live address at:

    http://www.lansdaletutoring.com/tilesbug

Thank you very much for the quick response on a Saturday morning no less.


                                                     -=> Gregg <=-

Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 9/23/06, Gregg Leichtman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I noticed that I was using an old DTD in my tiles-defs.xml so I updated
>> it to 1.3 on my home system (not the website version) and this made no
>> difference in terms of the results I'm getting.
>
> There is now a 2.0 DTD, but so far the only change is that it no
> longer supports <component-definitions> and <component-instances> in
> tiles-defs.xml.  Go ahead and switch over, though, I'll probably drop
> support for the older DTDs this weekend after I remove a few more
> things.  See SB-30 [1].
>
> Can you zip up the project source code and post it?
>
> Content appearing out of order is a problem that comes up when mixing
> JSF and JSP, but I'm not sure what the exact solution is in this case.
>
> You mentioned running into this problem with the latest snapshot.  Was
> it working before that?  If so, what is the date of a snapshot that
> does not show this problem?
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-30
>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to