Yes, it does certainly "feel" easier to just go straight to bytecode. (well, not exactly...I mean you're still basically just passing a String with java code in it to javassist) At least it wouldn't involve as much hashing lookup kind of operations to complete.
I'd still be open to doing whatever I can to help, even if it means taking some direction in design suggestions from others. Bob Lee wrote: > > I wouldn't jump straight to a bytecode solution, there's no reason it > should > be that much faster than a well-designed plain Java solution. > > Bob > > On 12/13/06, Jessek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> Last time I'll interrupt your normal dev cycle I promise. >> >> Since it seems we are both equally screwed in the short term by any non >> ognl >> solution it might be beneficial to consider just fixing it. I'm very >> familiar with javassist bytecode manipulation and vaguely familiar with >> the >> internal workings of ognl. It doesn't seem like it would be extremely >> hard >> to do. >> >> If it didn't look like my time/efforts would be wasted/ignored I might be >> willing to collaborate with whoever is interested (and able to commit to >> ognl) on finding a workable solution. >> >> >> Ted Husted-3 wrote: >> > >> > On 12/13/06, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Do you have the performance numbers that you can share? I'd really be >> >> interested in them. >> > >> > There are some interesting numbers here >> > >> > * >> > >> http://javajmc.blogspot.com/2006/10/webwork-and-stripes-simple-performance.html >> > >> > (be sure to read to the *end* of the commnets). >> > >> > We might want to come up with a set of test pages that thorougly >> > exercise the core tags, so that we can run our own direct comparisons >> > of S1, S2, et al. >> > >> > Of course, the peformance is the still same as WebWork 2, which is >> > driving some serious applications. We also know exactly where lies the >> > bottleneck. We need to fix or replace OGNL. >> > >> > -Ted. >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/OGNL-performance-detrimental-to-Struts-2-tf2804655.html#a7856772 >> Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/OGNL-performance-detrimental-to-Struts-2-tf2804655.html#a7858208 Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
