The key question is whether someone is ready to roll a 2.1.0 release. Once that happens, it makes sense to put the prior minor release series into "maintenance mode". But, until that happens, it makes equal sense to keep pumping out 2.0.x releases with any likely changes. We don't want to fall behind on the 2.0.x branch if the 2.1.0 branch is not ready-to-go.
-Ted. On 6/7/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes they should! As a matter of fact I wanted to ask, are we going to have a 2.0.9 release? I thought we were going to jump into 2.1 after 2.0.8, given that 2.1 is almost 2.0.8 + ajax refactoring, and the ajax part is done (few bugs still open). musachy On 6/7/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all! > I noticed that, prior to the 2_0_8 tagging, some changes have been > made to STRUTS_2_0_X and not ported to the trunk. > Should they be merged to the trunk, or is there a reason for not doing it? > > Ciao > Antonio > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
-- HTH, Ted <http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
