-1 for that from my point of view: - id in html page context refers the unique identifier on a page, whereas name lets you bind to a named target, not necessarily having to be unique on the page. set clearly references a name from that understanding (set the named property). I would find id quite misleading. - TONS of documentation resources, including third party, reference the set tag (as a WW2 / S2 / even WW1 tag). It is one of the most used tags. Once we deprecate this, this docs will have to be changed or will confuse users.
Regards, Rene Musachy Barroso schrieb: > This is a really minor thing, but it gets me all the time, the set tag uses > the "name" attribute for the variable name, while the url, and bean tags > use > "id", anybody against deprecating the "name" attribute in set and using > "id" > instead? > > regards > musachy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
