2007/8/7, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > "What files in an Apache release do not require a license header? > A file without any degree of creativity in either its literal elements > or its structure is not protected by copyright law; therefore, such a > file does not require a license header. If in doubt about the extent > of the file's creativity, add the license header to the file." > > I think for config and CSS files you could easily argue these fall > under this category
I disagree for CSS files: for example, we need to add a notice line about the use of "Nifty Corners", that, essentially, is made of CSS. What I intended to do is creating a build that fails in case an invalid license is present, so I wish to have a minimum amount of "skipped" files (you can see them in the rat-maven-plugin configuration). Antonio
