All of the creative works in the distribution are covered by the license in the root directory.
We over perform in the case of source code files in case the file is separated from the distribution. But I don't see why that concern should apply to example files. If our charter were to create CSS and HTML files, then we might have different concerns. On 8/7/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/8/7, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > They did. We had that discussion already, and we definitely don't need > > the license headers in script files that are interpreted at runtime. > > But I think that script files are creative works, so are CSS files and > simple (not-generated) HTML files. It's the work of a web designer, isn't > it? I think that we are saying that web designers are not creative :-) > > Antonio --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
