2008/1/15, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Sorry I don't understand, because English is not my mother tongue. > Please > > elaborate it. > > > > From what you said the only way you know if a release will be supported is > if you are helping to support it, so from that you should only be voting > for > releases which you are willing to support.
Right, in different cases I should vote +0 or -0. Thanks for clarifying this. When the vote takes place you should intend to help support it, but if when > the vote takes place you don't intend to support it then I beleive you > shouldn't be voting, or even voting -1 if you feel something is > unsupportable by the community (e.g. the dojo/datetime problems in S2.0). +1 By death I mean death of the feature or the volunteer, whichever happens > first :-). Let's hope it's the former :-D > And what I'm saying is that you are obliged, ONLY when you vote, to vote > with the best intentions of helping to support the release. > > You are not obliged to support the release continually because we all have > unexpected things happen in our lives which take up our time, but if your > voting your obligation is to vote with what your intention is and not to > vote when you don't intend to help out. What about replacing the term "obligation" with "intention"? > otherwise you're basically > >> saying "let it out, and let some other sucker handle the fall out". > > > > > > > > So we are all suckers :-) > > Only if we continually make releases without intending to help support > them > :). That never happened up to now... Ciao Antonio
