On Tue, January 15, 2008 5:04 am, Ted Husted wrote: > On Jan 15, 2008 5:00 AM, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> What about replacing the term "obligation" with "intention"? > > +1 -- The voter's "intention" was the original point, and the most we > could ever ask.
+1 here as well to the principal. One debatable point: there would be a subtle difference between saying "a +1 vote implies *intention* to support the release" versus saying "a +1 vote implies *willingness* to support the release". Especially if you might be talking about writing this down somewhere, I think that subtle difference is worth thinking about. "Willingness" is slightly less of an obligation than "intention", so there's shades of gray to consider. Frank -- Frank W. Zammetti Author of "Practical DWR 2 Projects" (2008, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-941-1) and "JavaScript, DOM Scripting and Ajax Projects" (2007, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-816-4) and "Practical Ajax Projects With Java Technology" (2006, Apress, ISBN 1-59059-695-1) Java Web Parts - http://javawebparts.sourceforge.net Supplying the wheel, so you don't have to reinvent it! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
