Thanks to those who answered my original question.  The gist of the 
responses seemed to be that, no, Struts 1.3.9 will not move up to 
BeanUtils 1.8.0 (will stay at 1.7.0).  So now I'm wondering why not.  Is 
it mostly just a timing issue (i.e., don't want to delay Struts 1.3.9 
release until BeanUtils 1.8.0 is released)?  Or is it something else?  It 
was also recommended that one could safely substitute BeanUtils 1.8.0 for 
1.7.0 themselves in their Struts 1.3.9 usages (once both are released), so 
there doesn't seem to be a concern about compatibility.  I ask because I 
suspect that it will be a while before Struts 1.4 comes out.
Thanks.
- Gary 
Gary Johnston
Team Lead, Web Diagram Editor, Struts Tools
Rational Application Developer Development

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(919) 254-0027; tieline: 444-0027; ITN: 24440027
4205 S. Miami Blvd., Durham, NC 27703-9141
USPS: PO Box 12195, 9ZUA/B501/N112, 3039 Cornwallis Rd.
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2195 


----- Forwarded by Gary Johnston/Raleigh/IBM on 03/03/2008 01:03 PM -----

Gary Johnston/Raleigh/IBM 
02/28/2008 01:36 PM

To
dev@struts.apache.org
cc

Subject
BeanUtils 1.8.0 in Struts 1.3.9?





Hi, all,
I couldn't find an answer to this in the 1.3.9 beta docs or in the mailing 
list archives:  Does Struts 1.3.9 plan to move up to BeanUtils 1.8.0? Both 
are currently beta releases, but the Struts 1.3.9 beta includes BeanUtils 
1.7.0.  Any chance that the next Struts 1.3.9 beta/rc/whatever could move 
up to include BeanUtils 1.8.0 beta (and, subsequently, BeanUtils 1.8.0 
once it is released)?  BeanUtils hasn't had a release in quite a while, so 
it seems like it would be a good opportunity for Struts 1.3.9 to release 
with the latest and greatest BeanUtils.
- Gary 
Gary Johnston
Team Lead, Web Diagram Editor, Struts Tools
Rational Application Developer Development

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(919) 254-0027; tieline: 444-0027; ITN: 24440027
4205 S. Miami Blvd., Durham, NC 27703-9141
USPS: PO Box 12195, 9ZUA/B501/N112, 3039 Cornwallis Rd.
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2195 

Reply via email to