WW-2667 is fixed on trunk. Has anybody taken a look at the multiple unknown handlers proposal? I have the code ready to go but I am still waiting for some confirmation :)
musachy On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I created a proposal page on the wiki for this: > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/S2WIKI/Convention%2CCodebehind+and+REST+2.3 > > I also opened a ticket for fixing the depenency between > REST->Codebehind, which I don't see why it should exists: > > https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2667 > > After taking care of that issue, and if we get to agree on the new > "unknown-handler-stack" (nobody has said anything pro/against yet), we > are done with the blocking concerns. (I think) > > musachy > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Here is yet another idea, this one assumes that multiple >> UnknowHandler(s) can be stacked (which I am prototyping). If we modify >> ControllerClasspathPackageProvider, so it delegates to an instance of >> ClasspathPackageProvider instead of extending it, and using reflection >> for the delegation of those few methods, we could have a nice setup: >> >> 1. Applications using Codebehind >> No changes to Codebehind were done, they will continue to work >> >> 2.Applications using Codebehind + REST >> REST ControllerClasspathPackageProvider will find Codebehind's >> ClasspathPackageProvider in the classpath, and delegate to it using >> reflection. These applications will continue to work without any >> modification. >> >> 3. Applications using REST + Convention >> REST ControllerClasspathPackageProvider won't find Codebehind's >> ClasspathPackageProvider in the classpath so it won't do anything. >> REST will work on top of Convention (this works fine). >> >> Plugins will be standalone, like they are now, and backward >> compatibility will be kept. As a side effect, REST could be used with >> XML configuration without Codebehind being in the classpath. I know >> reflection is not a very elegant solution, but it would be temporary >> until Codebehind is phased out, a few versions later. >> >> musachy >> > > > > -- > "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
