Musachy Barroso wrote:
Yes, that option is totally viable now that they can co-exist(assuming
that multiple unknown handlers are supported). One drawback it has, is
that for new users of the plugin, it would be confusing to have 2 sets
of similar annotations. The other problem would be the documentation,
we don't have many contributors working on the documentation, and I
can see the documentation for both getting mixed up, resulting in ever
more confusion. (if they were going to be on the same plugin) . I
guess I would be fine with merging them (+0), but I would give my +1
to keeping them on different plugins.
musachy
Okay. Although, I've noticed similar confusion already in struts-user
because there are two plugins.
I was thinking more along the lines of only having one set of annotations:
ie. org.apache.struts2.config.Result is overwritten by the current
org.apache.struts2.convention.annotation.Result and remains at
org.apache.struts2.config.
I'm behind whatever decision you make as you're putting all the effort
in and I think the direction is right.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
