The scenario where S2 would become a JCP approved JSR is pretty much scary IMO:
1) It means it exists a Reference Implementation of S2, or that S2 is build upon a RI of something else. 2) Any vendor can come up with their own flavors and extensions of the JSR, which brings more FUD than solutions. Instead, I'd like to see S2 building functionality upon itself more like: 1) the "flow" concept (like Spring WF) 2) improving validation framework (validating against JSR 303 compliant POJOs)i or other things that are not framework specific but useful, like having a repository of themes for changing the L&F of the apps. Think having to develop a new app, your customer pick a design from www.oswd.org and you have to create a new theme for that particular design. If you could just find that theme already built THAT would be a time saver. 2008/8/22, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Frans Thamura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > is it possible that S2 become part of JCP? > > java server action framework > > right now only component framework there > > any idea? > > While I cringe every time I hear someone say that they chose JSF > because "It's the standard" there's no way I would want to see Struts > 2 attempt the JCP. It wouldn't be Struts 2 by the time you came out > the other end, and, well... what Martin said. ;) > > -- > Wendy > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
