I second Dave's opinion. Patches are always welcomed. musachy
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Dave Newton <[email protected]> wrote: > --- On Thu, 12/11/08, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote: >> Will patches implementing this get accepted? > > How can we answer that before getting the patches? I, for one, would probably > evaluate such a patch: as long as it doesn't break anything else, and > particularly if it solves indexed properties correctly (handling both maps > and sequences), I'm interested. > > (Actually, I pretty much only care about indexed properties, but I'm sure the > other is nice too. Although without trivial validation support for indexed > properties it doesn't seem as useful--feel free to throw that in as well!) > > Dave > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
