On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Paul Benedict<pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > I definitely agree that Struts 3 would be a good candidate to do this XWork > migration. It is not an appropriate candidate for 2.1, or 2.2. However, if > you like to do a 2.5 (I dislike superficial jumps in versions though), then > it might be acceptable in the 2.x branch.
IMO "Struts 3" would imply a major change in Struts itself, the possibility of backwards incompatible changes, etc. This isn't... community aspects aside, it's just moving some code from one svn repo to another. -Wendy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
