> -----Original Message----- > From: Frans Thamura [mailto:fr...@meruvian.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 13:00 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?) > > any idea to make xwork implementaiton in spring, like pendulum did
Please no, we have to many projects/customers where spring is not approved. > > so struts will have non web implementation > > will this happen? > > > -- > Frans Thamura > Meruvian. > Center of Java and Enterprise OpenSource > > Meruvian bukan hanya membuat anak SMK menjadi bisa tapi > SAKTI, malah saktinya SAKTI Mandraguna. > > > Mobile: +62 855 7888 699 > Blog & Profile: http://frans.thamura.info > > We provide services to migrate your apps to Java (web), in > amazing fast and reliable. > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Jason > Pyeron<jpye...@pdinc.us> wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Musachy Barroso [mailto:musa...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:45 > >> To: Struts Developers List > >> Subject: Re: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?) > >> > >> Have we reached any kind of consensus about bringing xwork > in? If we > >> are going to release a new major version could be another > discussion. > > > > > > (Assumption: waiting on release because patches made to > trunk not yet included > > into released jar....) > > > > Why can we use their trunk or snapshots? > > > > If we fork we are essentially loosing their QA process anyway... > > > > My .02$ > > > >> > >> musachy > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Brian > >> Pontarelli<br...@pontarelli.com> wrote: > >> > Why so hesitant to do another release? It has been a long > >> time since > >> > 2.0. I think it is time for some major rework and releasing > >> a new major version. > >> > > >> > Sent from my iPhone > >> > > >> > On Aug 12, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Paul > >> Benedict<pbened...@apache.org> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Are you sure it's not an incompatible change? I thought the > >> >>> discussion was the importing of XWork and getting rid of its > >> >>> branding. That means all of XWork's annotations and > >> packages would > >> >>> be changed to org.apache.struts. I don't believe there is > >> any desire > >> >>> to keep com.opensymphony when this occurs. > >> >>> So my thinking would be this would be an incompatible > >> change. Did I > >> >>> get it wrong? > >> >> > >> >> I think completely removing any trace of xwork is a > good long term > >> >> 3.0 goal, but for now, we would simply fork it, keeping > >> the package > >> >> structure and class names. > >> >> > >> >> Don > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Wendy Smoak > >> <wsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Paul > >> >>>> Benedict<pbened...@apache.org> > >> >>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> I definitely agree that Struts 3 would be a good > >> candidate to do > >> >>>>> this > >> >>>> > >> >>>> XWork > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> migration. It is not an appropriate candidate for > 2.1, or 2.2. > >> >>>>> However, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> if > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> you like to do a 2.5 (I dislike superficial jumps in versions > >> >>>>> though), > >> >>>> > >> >>>> then > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> it might be acceptable in the 2.x branch. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> IMO "Struts 3" would imply a major change in Struts > itself, the > >> >>>> possibility of backwards incompatible changes, etc. > >> This isn't... > >> >>>> community aspects aside, it's just moving some code > from one svn > >> >>>> repo to another. -Wendy > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For > >> >>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For > >> >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For > >> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For > >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > - - > > - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - > > - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - > > - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - > > - - > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
