any idea to make xwork implementaiton in spring, like pendulum did so struts will have non web implementation
will this happen? -- Frans Thamura Meruvian. Center of Java and Enterprise OpenSource Meruvian bukan hanya membuat anak SMK menjadi bisa tapi SAKTI, malah saktinya SAKTI Mandraguna. Mobile: +62 855 7888 699 Blog & Profile: http://frans.thamura.info We provide services to migrate your apps to Java (web), in amazing fast and reliable. On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Jason Pyeron<jpye...@pdinc.us> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Musachy Barroso [mailto:musa...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:45 >> To: Struts Developers List >> Subject: Re: Let's kill xwork (was Re: 2.1.8 release?) >> >> Have we reached any kind of consensus about bringing xwork >> in? If we are going to release a new major version could be >> another discussion. > > > (Assumption: waiting on release because patches made to trunk not yet included > into released jar....) > > Why can we use their trunk or snapshots? > > If we fork we are essentially loosing their QA process anyway... > > My .02$ > >> >> musachy >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Brian >> Pontarelli<br...@pontarelli.com> wrote: >> > Why so hesitant to do another release? It has been a long >> time since >> > 2.0. I think it is time for some major rework and releasing >> a new major version. >> > >> > Sent from my iPhone >> > >> > On Aug 12, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Paul >> Benedict<pbened...@apache.org> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Are you sure it's not an incompatible change? I thought the >> >>> discussion was the importing of XWork and getting rid of its >> >>> branding. That means all of XWork's annotations and >> packages would >> >>> be changed to org.apache.struts. I don't believe there is >> any desire >> >>> to keep com.opensymphony when this occurs. >> >>> So my thinking would be this would be an incompatible >> change. Did I >> >>> get it wrong? >> >> >> >> I think completely removing any trace of xwork is a good long term >> >> 3.0 goal, but for now, we would simply fork it, keeping >> the package >> >> structure and class names. >> >> >> >> Don >> >> >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Wendy Smoak >> <wsm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Paul >> >>>> Benedict<pbened...@apache.org> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I definitely agree that Struts 3 would be a good >> candidate to do >> >>>>> this >> >>>> >> >>>> XWork >> >>>>> >> >>>>> migration. It is not an appropriate candidate for 2.1, or 2.2. >> >>>>> However, >> >>>> >> >>>> if >> >>>>> >> >>>>> you like to do a 2.5 (I dislike superficial jumps in versions >> >>>>> though), >> >>>> >> >>>> then >> >>>>> >> >>>>> it might be acceptable in the 2.x branch. >> >>>> >> >>>> IMO "Struts 3" would imply a major change in Struts itself, the >> >>>> possibility of backwards incompatible changes, etc. >> This isn't... >> >>>> community aspects aside, it's just moving some code from one svn >> >>>> repo to another. -Wendy >> >>>> >> >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For >> >>>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For >> >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For >> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> >> > > > > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > - - > - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - > - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - > - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - > - - > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
