I agree. This is a discussion needed to determine short-, medium and long term goals. If we agree priorities can be more effective at the time we spend. Right now my colleague Albert and I are still working on improving and expanding the capabilities of the REST plugin to easy the creation of hypermedia driven applications. Honestly, I think this is a crucial point if we want struts 2 to stay relevant . But that is our point of view. Improving documentation is a must as well. How can we cooridinate efforts effectively?
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Dave Newton <davelnew...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:36 AM, John Lindal wrote: > >> Why do you consider its position precarious? Stability is good in the corp >> world :) >> > > Precarious in that: > > 1) Not huge uptake due to plethora of options--can't reduce the number of > options, but can make S2 more appealing. > 2) Some plugins are pretty rusty. > 3) Docs need some serious gardening and re-org > 4) Stability is fine; COBOL was stable for a really long time. But with that > should come innovation and good reasons to stick with it other than inertia. > 5) I think if the internals were leaner/cleaner it'd be easier to take stock > of where we're at and tighten things up. > > Dave > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
