Matt makes a good pointone of the primary reasons to select Struts MVC Framework over Spring is the ability of Struts2 to work with previous Struts versions (Struts1) +1 for Matt
Martin ______________________________________________ Please do not alter or disrupt this transmission...Thank You > Subject: Re: Plan for Struts 3 > From: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:59:51 -0700 > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > > If it breaks backwards-compatibility, I'd suggest not doing it. I've always > been impressed with projects like Spring that've maintained backwards > compatibility w/o making a breaking change such as this. > > On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Jeff Black <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Never mind. > > > > I suppose it makes sense to some extent; however I'm with Dave when it > > comes to incorporating the version number in the package name. > > > > Just my two cents. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Jeff Black <[email protected]> > > To: Struts Developers List <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:50 PM > > Subject: Re: Plan for Struts 3 > > > > Is it really necessary to alter the package name? > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]> > > To: Struts Developers List <[email protected]> > > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 5:35 AM > > Subject: Re: Plan for Struts 3 > > > > 2012/11/22 Dave Newton <[email protected]>: > >> How useful is the Struts 1 plugin? > > > > It's mentioned as a migration way for S1 projects, but we can drop > > support for S1 in S3 > > > > > > Regards > > -- > > Łukasz > > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
