Part of the question regarded org.apache.struts v. org.apache.struts2. I don't know how many (if any) conflicts there are.
I'm not a fan of embedding version info in package names. I'd hate to see org.apache.struts3, and IMO it'd be confusing to have Struts 3 have a struts2 package name component. Dave On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps I don't understand, but you can run Struts 1 and Struts 2 > simultaneously. They have different Maven artifacts and Java package names. > > The discussion was about whether to continue supporting the Struts 1 Plugin > in S3. I am of the opinion "no" because it provides such limited > capabilities. It doesn't really help since all you get is the Action layer, > not the taglib. Anyone who built an S1 app still has to rewrite their > presentation layer in S2/S3 -- so might as go all the way and port it all > to S3. > > Paul > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Martin Gainty <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Matt makes a good pointone of the primary reasons to select Struts MVC >> Framework over Spring is the ability of Struts2 to work with previous >> Struts versions (Struts1) >> +1 for Matt >> >> Martin >> ______________________________________________ >> Please do not alter or disrupt this transmission...Thank You >> > Subject: Re: Plan for Struts 3 >> > From: [email protected] >> > Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:59:51 -0700 >> > To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> > >> > If it breaks backwards-compatibility, I'd suggest not doing it. I've >> always been impressed with projects like Spring that've maintained >> backwards compatibility w/o making a breaking change such as this. >> > >> > On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:54 PM, Jeff Black <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > Never mind. >> > > >> > > I suppose it makes sense to some extent; however I'm with Dave when it >> comes to incorporating the version number in the package name. >> > > >> > > Just my two cents. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ________________________________ >> > > From: Jeff Black <[email protected]> >> > > To: Struts Developers List <[email protected]> >> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:50 PM >> > > Subject: Re: Plan for Struts 3 >> > > >> > > Is it really necessary to alter the package name? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ________________________________ >> > > From: Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]> >> > > To: Struts Developers List <[email protected]> >> > > Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 5:35 AM >> > > Subject: Re: Plan for Struts 3 >> > > >> > > 2012/11/22 Dave Newton <[email protected]>: >> > >> How useful is the Struts 1 plugin? >> > > >> > > It's mentioned as a migration way for S1 projects, but we can drop >> > > support for S1 in S3 >> > > >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > -- >> > > Łukasz >> > > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> -- e: [email protected] m: 908-380-8699 s: davelnewton_skype t: @dave_newton b: Bucky Bits g: davelnewton so: Dave Newton --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
