Done!

Can we start with silence consensus process to push the new site to production?


Regards
-- 
Ɓukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/

2013/9/15 Rene Gielen <rene.gie...@gmail.com>:
> Am 15.09.13 10:46, schrieb Lukasz Lenart:
>> 2013/9/14 bphill...@ku.edu <bphill...@ku.edu>:
>>> For the Documentation menu items why not use Struts 2 and Struts 1 as menu
>>> choices instead of Struts 2.3.x and Struts 1.3.x.  When we release Struts
>>> 2.4 we'll have to change those.  The page those menu items link to (which
>>> right now is not working) can specify the current version (e.g. 2.3.15.1).
>>
>> Let it stay as is for now. I want to remove all those docs per branch
>> we have right now and just expose docs related to the latest release,
>> e.g. /docs - there be no more 2.3.x and 1.3.x. Draft docs will be
>> removed as we should stick with Confluence or Apache CMS in the
>> future.
>>
>
> Staying with current link targets is good for now, I agree. But naming
> the menu items just Documentation/Struts 2 and Documentation/Struts 1,
> as Bruce suggested, is IMO a good way to go
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org

Reply via email to