It just came up to my mind - it's almost over a week when the new site is available via staging and people were commenting and suggesting changes all the time :-) No one disagreed or was against it, so I'd like to hit the [Publish Site] today's afternoon - at least allow Christian to do it :-)
Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2013/9/17 Lukasz Lenart <lukaszlen...@apache.org>: > Done! > > Can we start with silence consensus process to push the new site to > production? > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > > 2013/9/15 Rene Gielen <rene.gie...@gmail.com>: >> Am 15.09.13 10:46, schrieb Lukasz Lenart: >>> 2013/9/14 bphill...@ku.edu <bphill...@ku.edu>: >>>> For the Documentation menu items why not use Struts 2 and Struts 1 as menu >>>> choices instead of Struts 2.3.x and Struts 1.3.x. When we release Struts >>>> 2.4 we'll have to change those. The page those menu items link to (which >>>> right now is not working) can specify the current version (e.g. 2.3.15.1). >>> >>> Let it stay as is for now. I want to remove all those docs per branch >>> we have right now and just expose docs related to the latest release, >>> e.g. /docs - there be no more 2.3.x and 1.3.x. Draft docs will be >>> removed as we should stick with Confluence or Apache CMS in the >>> future. >>> >> >> Staying with current link targets is good for now, I agree. But naming >> the menu items just Documentation/Struts 2 and Documentation/Struts 1, >> as Bruce suggested, is IMO a good way to go >> >>> >>> Regards >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
