Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> writes: > C. Michael Pilato wrote on Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:10:28 -0400: >> Option #1 -- releasing a release candidate that's not a candidate for >> release -- just doesn't make any sense to me. > > There are still items on > http://subversion.apache.org/roadmap#release-status that don't have > a green light next to them. Shouldn't, by your logic, all of them be > green before an RC is rolled?
It's possible that release-status will go green without requring and release critical changes to the tarball. "Don't release an -rc that is know to be broken" and "don't release an -rc that may need changes" are different rules. -- uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy http://www.uberSVN.com
