On 23.08.2011 21:21, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:03:15PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> I wonder if it even makes sense to fix this case for upgrade. After all,
>> we could just tell users to unlock files before upgrading their working
>> copies.
> Do you mean that it doesn't need to be fixed, ever?
> Or that this isn't a critical fix to have in the .0 release?

It isn't critical to fix in the .0 release and not a good enough reason
to scrap RC1. I'd hesitate to call it a release blocker, after all,
there's a perfectly good workaround, and AFAIU not the only limitation
of the upgrader.

-- Brane

Reply via email to