Hyrum K Wright wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Julian Foad <[email protected]> wrote: > > Having read the discussion elsethread, I now consider this a blocker and > > that also seems to be the consensus. So we can't release 1.7.0 with > > this bug; it has to be fixed. That in turn means the supposed 'RC1' is > > no longer an RC at all. [...] > > So the grander feeling seems to be: scuttle rc1 (which already has the > votes for release)
I interpreted Bert's "+1 as it passes regression tests but -1 to release as Subversion 1.7.0" the same as a "-1" vote for RC1, based on my understanding of the requirements for an RC. To make it plain, I hereby change my own RC1 vote to -1. > and reroll an rc2. The fix for the 'upgrade with > lock' issue is already on 1.7.x, so we can do this pretty much > whenever we'd like. I'm inclined to do it tomorrow, following the > normal pattern. +1 to that. - Julian
