On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 10:54 AM, pancake <panc...@youterm.com> wrote: > On 05/24/11 19:12, Rafa Garcia Gallego wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Christian Neukirchen >> <chneukirc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Remotely reminds me of http://code.google.com/p/aoeui/ which also is >>> pretty lightweight, has UTF8, is binary-safe, and has infinite >>> undo. ~7KLOC, no curses dependency. >> >> This reminds me of my very own sandy[1]. Sorry for the blatant publicity. >> >> Ok, mine depends on ncurses, but the again it weights some 1700 SLOC >> only. The idea of using external tools to process text seems quite >> suckless to me. >> >> [1] http://sandyeditor.sf.net/ >> > Wow. sandy sources looks great. I managed to reproduce some segfaults and > I feel not comfortable with a non-hjkl editor. but as long as it's > configurable in > the config.h.
Well, I tried to go for an almost modeless editor because I like it better in theory. But I keep falling back to vi(m) to do serious edits, even on the sandy code (shame on me!). Maybe I should try adding two modes to it, see how it plays out. The default bindings are there to be changed, of course. I imagined emacs-like bindings (read bash-like too) would be comfy for most people. About the segfaults, argh! Could you please point them out to me? Or maybe patch them yourself if you have the time :) > What about moving that repo to hg.suckless.org ? Sure! don't I need a SSH account or something? Cheers, Rafa.
