While I agree that a collection of suckless tools under one roof wouldbe pretty awesome (especially something like sta.li or witch linux), I'mnot sure that marketing as a desktop environment is the right thing to do. I'm part of a small project called tudor[0] that aims to replicate a DE experience without all of the overhead (honestly, it works a lot likelxde without tools aimed at use solely with lxde). However, we're finding that the idea of a 'desktop environment' is tainted - people see it as a monolithic entity that precludes use of any software not shippedwith the desktop environment itself (or 'compatible' software - an ideaI find simply absurd). Point being: if we're going to ship somethingpackaged together, we need to find a different way to say 'desktopenvironment'. The term carries a lot of weight. [0]: https://bitbucket.org/darvid/tudor/wiki/Home
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Sean Howard
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Corey Thomasson
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Petr Sabata
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Sean Howard
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment stanio
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Anselm R Garbe
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Christoph Lohmann
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Anselm R Garbe
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment lordkrandel
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Manolo Martínez
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Bryan Bennett
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Bryan Bennett
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Justin Pogue
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Kurt H Maier
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Yoshi Rokuko
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Jacob Todd
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Seth Hover
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Jacob Todd
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Sime Ramov
- Re: [dev] Suckless Desktop Environment Seth Hover