Patching software to work with musl libc (and sending patches upstream) improves overall software. Not that much is needed. Most programs work out of the box with musl.
There was a talk about this a few months ago. https://video.fosdem.org/2017/K.4.601/building_a_distro_with_musl_libc.vp8.webm On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 4:57 PM, robin <robin.a.t.peder...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 01:13:21AM +0000, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com wrote: >> I did check alpine package web browsers: it's full of libgcc_s deps. >> >> You can forget alpine as a no libgcc_s distro. At least, they do maintain the >> patches required in order to compile many software packages with the musl >> libc. > > Patching the shit out of everything... > I don't like this. It seems like a hassle and it only treats symptoms > while the cause is still poisoning the forest. > I'd rather live in shit-world until a proper solution exist. >
