I should, so there isn't any? I have alpine here ready and waiting... On 7/3/17, sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com <sylvain.bertr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 02:53:30PM +0200, hiro wrote: >> so if i'm on musl and tell gcc to link statically it should just work? >> in that case i'll try and report. > > Meaning that, in theory, you can have a libc which does not require > libgcc_s > (coze of pthread_cancel) with musl. > > Namely, you should be able to have a "working" distro with a 'static gcc', > namely > which frontend statically links libgcc_eh.a and libgcc.a _only_ and _not_ > libgcc_s.so. > > For c++ retards and sub-humans, I fear that there are some libgcc_s.so hard > deps in gcc libstdc++ > related to c++ threading (that would need investigation). > > -- > Sylvain > >
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementations Laslo Hunhold
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementations v4hn
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementations Hiltjo Posthuma
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementations Alba Pompeo
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementations Louis Santillan
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementations Hiltjo Posthuma
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementations hiro
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementations sylvain . bertrand
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... hiro
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... sylvain . bertrand
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... hiro
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... sylvain . bertrand
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... sylvain . bertrand
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... robin
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... Alba Pompeo
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... Cág
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... Quentin Rameau
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... Cág
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... hiro
- Re: [dev] Xorg implementation... Bobby Powers