It looks like I misunderstood the proposal. I was with the impression that we 
wanted to render the Google page inside SQL Lab but the proposal is just to 
switch the rendering of the result as HTML or plain text. If I understood 
correctly this time, then I have no objections.

Best regards,
Michael S. Molina

> On 8 Mar 2024, at 13:28, Beto Dealmeida <robe...@dealmeida.net.invalid> wrote:
> 
> Right, I'm not worried about security issues, since we already do this by 
> default and the current behavior can cause problems like stripping XML tags 
> from a string response!
> 
> (To see what I mean, just run
> 
> ```
> SELECT '<xml>hello</xml>' AS xml;
> ```
> 
> in SQL Lab.)
> 
> I was just wondering if people had different ideas on this. Eg, I always 
> thought we could/should implement per-column — we could have extra metadata 
> in the column indicating it should be rendered as HTML, or we could use the 
> Jinja macro that I suggested.
> 
> But I'm OK with moving this forward based on lazy consensus without a SIP, 
> and maybe later we could start a discussion on rich rendering of data, that's 
> something that would be cool. Rendering images inline, exploding nested data 
> (structs and arrays) into multiple table cells, that kind of thing.
> 
> --Beto
> 
> 
>> On 3/8/24 11:14 AM, Evan Rusackas wrote:
>> It may also be worth noting that the current HTML rendering in SQL Lab 
>> (which can’t be disabled by the user) respects Talisman configs, so it can 
>> strip out the usual XSS concerns.
>> 
>> Evan Rusackas
>>> On Mar 8, 2024 at 9:09 AM -0700, Evan Rusackas <e...@rusackas.com>, wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I’d spoken to Yanisa about this previously. This change was on their list, 
>>> and I had advised them that this change might be fine with lazy consensus, 
>>> but if there’s controversy, they could elevate it to a SIP.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> My impression was that it’s not a big significant architectural change or 
>>> security risk since SQL Lab and other tables in Superset already render 
>>> HTML by default, so this doesn’t expose any new security risk. This simply 
>>> gives the user added control over this for certain use cases where you’d 
>>> want to disable the rendering.
>>> 
>>> It might warrant some design discussion around the placement of the switch, 
>>> or where else we might be able to provide similar controls in the future, 
>>> but I don’t see anything controversial or architecturally dangerous here 
>>> that would’ve required a SIP. Let me know if I’m missing something, as I 
>>> may well be :)
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Evan Rusackas
>>> On Mar 8, 2024 at 7:28 AM -0700, Michael S. Molina 
>>> <michael.s.mol...@gmail.com>, wrote:
>>>> Hi Yanisa,
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you for the proposal. As Beto mentioned, the best way to introduce 
>>>> new features to Superset is through the SIP process where we can 
>>>> collectively collaborate on the proposal. I bet that during the SIP review 
>>>> we’ll have many questions about the security implications of the proposed 
>>>> feature and how it interacts with our current HTML rendering restrictions.
>>>> 
>>>> To learn about SIPs, just check the link Beto provided.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Michael S. Molina
>>>> 
>>>>> On 8 Mar 2024, at 10:44, Beto Dealmeida <robe...@dealmeida.net.invalid> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do we have a SIP written for this? (see 
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/5602 for context)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also, did you consider having some kind of macro that would indicate to 
>>>>> the frontend that the result should be rendered as HTML? For example, 
>>>>> this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> ```
>>>>> SELECT product, {{ render_html('product_url') }}, price
>>>>> FROM some_table
>>>>> ```
>>>>> 
>>>>> Could generate SQL like this:
>>>>> 
>>>>> ```
>>>>> SELECT product, '<RENDER>' || product_url || '</RENDER>', price
>>>>> FROM some_table
>>>>> ```
>>>>> 
>>>>> Which would then be detected by the frontend and we'd render 
>>>>> `product_url` as HTML.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Then this could be defined at the column level, and people would be able 
>>>>> to create derived columns in datasets that are automatically rendered as 
>>>>> HTML.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --Beto
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 3/7/24 10:56 PM, Treesak, Yanisa (Agoda) wrote:
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I hope this email finds you well. I wanted to reach out to propose an 
>>>>>> idea for enhancing Superset SQLLab's functionality.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Currently, the platform renders any HTML command in the result table, 
>>>>>> which can sometimes obscure the full HTML in the request body. To 
>>>>>> address this, I suggest implementing an option button that enables users 
>>>>>> to control the rendering of HTML in the result table.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This feature would provide users with more flexibility and clarity when 
>>>>>> viewing HTML content within SQLLab. I believe it could greatly improve 
>>>>>> the user experience and streamline workflows.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I would appreciate your consideration of this proposal and would be 
>>>>>> happy to discuss it further at your convenience.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thank you for your time and attention.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> *Yanisa Treesak*
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Data Engineer
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Agoda Services Co., Ltd.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> a *Booking Holdings* company
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This message is confidential and is for the sole use of the
>>>>>> intended recipient(s). It may also be privileged or
>>>>>> otherwise protected by copyright or other legal rules. If
>>>>>> you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply
>>>>>> email and delete it from your system. It is prohibited to
>>>>>> copy this message or disclose its content to anyone. Any
>>>>>> confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost by any
>>>>>> mistaken delivery or unauthorized disclosure of the message.
>>>>>> All messages sent to and from Agoda may be monitored to
>>>>>> ensure compliance with company policies, to protect the
>>>>>> company's interests and to remove potential malware.
>>>>>> Electronic messages may be intercepted, amended, lost or
>>>>>> deleted, or contain viruses.
>>>>>> 
> 

Reply via email to