Hi all,

 Hope it is not late to add an opinion. In our case HTML rendering is mandatory in charts and dashboards. Maybe in SQLab could be optional or disabled (it could make sense to see actual data for debuging queries, and rendered result could not be so necessary at that level.)

We show rendered HTML data on dashboards and charts, specially links to external parts of our ERPs, web pages and so. Without html rendering, in our case, the funtionality of dashboards would be reduced drastically.

So, for us default HTML rendering should be the way, but if it can be disabled, it could be an interesting optional feature (if it not breaks backward compatibility)

Carlos


El 14/03/2024 a las 6:11, Evan Rusackas escribió:
Hi all,

I think we’re all caught up and on the same page here now. In short:
• HTML would be rendered by default
• This switch would effectively disable the rendering

If that’s all it does,, it sounds like there are no objections. Maybe it was 
just a matter of wording, where it would be “Add option to DISABLE rendering of 
HTML on SQL Lab’s results table” In any case, I’m not sure if we’re now on 
track for lazy consensus, or if it needs to be re-proposed

I’m +1 on this feature, and expect that it’ll spread to other tables (e.g. the 
Table viz) in the future.

-e-

Evan Rusackas
On Mar 8, 2024 at 4:08 PM -0700, Maxime Beauchemin<maximebeauche...@gmail.com>, 
wrote:
A github discussion (as opposed to a SIP) may be sufficient here, but open
to either. Clearly there's lots to talk about around the topic of
supporting html. I did some work around bringing in more support and
consistent support across the board in the past, mostly for links (`<a />`)
in various table views (table viz, results, samples) and cringe when I see
places where it's not supported properly like I don't think it's supported
in dashboard-level filters at the moment, unclear about explore filters (?)

Now <a 
href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/23047__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!Vy9ubuPwxELax75q1T8ZVzR1L9TPSA8ZjjyZY6_Ry4_dQlGkcS0FjFetXN9xnDATLQ9YtPAM3QqCOg$";>https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/23047</a>
 bring an interesting
point where sometimes you DONT want the link to render as a link, so there
needs to be a way to tell the UI to NOT render the html

Now for backwards compatibility, it'd be a breaking change to NOT render
where it's rendered currently, so maybe <no-render>{stuff}</no-render> is
no as elegant but better in terms of backwards compatilibty (?) I think
it's fair to say that in most cases you'd want to render (I'd say 80%+ but
maybe that's just me...) and we want for this to be the default so it can
be discovered easily.

On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 10:52, Evan Rusackas<e...@rusackas.com>  wrote:

On a related note, I just came across this old issue requesting such a
feature. I’m going to move it to a Discussion since it’s not a bug, and we
can close it out if/when this feature expands beyond SQL Lab. Feel free to
add comments if you feel it’s warranted:
<a 
href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/23047__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!Vy9ubuPwxELax75q1T8ZVzR1L9TPSA8ZjjyZY6_Ry4_dQlGkcS0FjFetXN9xnDATLQ9YtPAM3QqCOg$";>https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/23047</a>

Evan Rusackas
On Mar 8, 2024 at 9:47 AM -0700, Michael S. Molina <
michael.s.mol...@gmail.com>, wrote:
It looks like I misunderstood the proposal. I was with the impression
that we wanted to render the Google page inside SQL Lab but the proposal is
just to switch the rendering of the result as HTML or plain text. If I
understood correctly this time, then I have no objections.
Best regards,
Michael S. Molina

On 8 Mar 2024, at 13:28, Beto Dealmeida<robe...@dealmeida.net.invalid>
wrote:
Right, I'm not worried about security issues, since we already do this
by default and the current behavior can cause problems like stripping XML
tags from a string response!
(To see what I mean, just run

```
SELECT '<xml>hello</xml>' AS xml;
```

in SQL Lab.)

I was just wondering if people had different ideas on this. Eg, I
always thought we could/should implement per-column — we could have extra
metadata in the column indicating it should be rendered as HTML, or we
could use the Jinja macro that I suggested.
But I'm OK with moving this forward based on lazy consensus without a
SIP, and maybe later we could start a discussion on rich rendering of data,
that's something that would be cool. Rendering images inline, exploding
nested data (structs and arrays) into multiple table cells, that kind of
thing.
--Beto


On 3/8/24 11:14 AM, Evan Rusackas wrote:
It may also be worth noting that the current HTML rendering in SQL
Lab (which can’t be disabled by the user) respects Talisman configs, so it
can strip out the usual XSS concerns.
Evan Rusackas
On Mar 8, 2024 at 9:09 AM -0700, Evan Rusackas<e...@rusackas.com>,
wrote:
Hi all,

I’d spoken to Yanisa about this previously. This change was on
their list, and I had advised them that this change might be fine with lazy
consensus, but if there’s controversy, they could elevate it to a SIP.

My impression was that it’s not a big significant architectural
change or security risk since SQL Lab and other tables in Superset already
render HTML by default, so this doesn’t expose any new security risk. This
simply gives the user added control over this for certain use cases where
you’d want to disable the rendering.
It might warrant some design discussion around the placement of
the switch, or where else we might be able to provide similar controls in
the future, but I don’t see anything controversial or architecturally
dangerous here that would’ve required a SIP. Let me know if I’m missing
something, as I may well be :)
Thanks,

Evan Rusackas
On Mar 8, 2024 at 7:28 AM -0700, Michael S. Molina <
michael.s.mol...@gmail.com>, wrote:
Hi Yanisa,

Thank you for the proposal. As Beto mentioned, the best way to
introduce new features to Superset is through the SIP process where we can
collectively collaborate on the proposal. I bet that during the SIP review
we’ll have many questions about the security implications of the proposed
feature and how it interacts with our current HTML rendering restrictions.
To learn about SIPs, just check the link Beto provided.

Best regards,
Michael S. Molina

On 8 Mar 2024, at 10:44, Beto Dealmeida
<robe...@dealmeida.net.invalid>  wrote:
Do we have a SIP written for this? (see
<a 
href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/5602__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!Vy9ubuPwxELax75q1T8ZVzR1L9TPSA8ZjjyZY6_Ry4_dQlGkcS0FjFetXN9xnDATLQ9YtPDitwGh9g$";>https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/5602</a>
 for context)
Also, did you consider having some kind of macro that would
indicate to the frontend that the result should be rendered as HTML? For
example, this:
```
SELECT product, {{ render_html('product_url') }}, price
FROM some_table
```

Could generate SQL like this:

```
SELECT product, '<RENDER>' || product_url || '</RENDER>', price
FROM some_table
```

Which would then be detected by the frontend and we'd render
`product_url` as HTML.
Then this could be defined at the column level, and people
would be able to create derived columns in datasets that are automatically
rendered as HTML.
--Beto

On 3/7/24 10:56 PM, Treesak, Yanisa (Agoda) wrote:
Hi everyone,

I hope this email finds you well. I wanted to reach out to
propose an idea for enhancing Superset SQLLab's functionality.
Currently, the platform renders any HTML command in the
result table, which can sometimes obscure the full HTML in the request
body. To address this, I suggest implementing an option button that enables
users to control the rendering of HTML in the result table.

This feature would provide users with more flexibility and
clarity when viewing HTML content within SQLLab. I believe it could greatly
improve the user experience and streamline workflows.
I would appreciate your consideration of this proposal and
would be happy to discuss it further at your convenience.
Thank you for your time and attention.

Best regards,

*Yanisa Treesak*

Data Engineer

Agoda Services Co., Ltd.

a *Booking Holdings* company



------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is confidential and is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s). It may also be privileged or
otherwise protected by copyright or other legal rules. If
you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply
email and delete it from your system. It is prohibited to
copy this message or disclose its content to anyone. Any
confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost by any
mistaken delivery or unauthorized disclosure of the message.
All messages sent to and from Agoda may be monitored to
ensure compliance with company policies, to protect the
company's interests and to remove potential malware.
Electronic messages may be intercepted, amended, lost or
deleted, or contain viruses.


--

Carlos Alonso Vega
Jefe de la Sección Servicios Campus
Servicio Informático - Informatika Zerbitzua
*Universidad Pública de Navarra - Nafarroako Unibertsitate Publikoa*
+34 948 169652
carlos.alo...@unavarra.es

Reply via email to