On a related note, I just came across this old issue requesting such a feature. 
I’m going to move it to a Discussion since it’s not a bug, and we can close it 
out if/when this feature expands beyond SQL Lab. Feel free to add comments if 
you feel it’s warranted: https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/23047

Evan Rusackas
On Mar 8, 2024 at 9:47 AM -0700, Michael S. Molina 
<michael.s.mol...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> It looks like I misunderstood the proposal. I was with the impression that we 
> wanted to render the Google page inside SQL Lab but the proposal is just to 
> switch the rendering of the result as HTML or plain text. If I understood 
> correctly this time, then I have no objections.
>
> Best regards,
> Michael S. Molina
>
> > On 8 Mar 2024, at 13:28, Beto Dealmeida <robe...@dealmeida.net.invalid> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > Right, I'm not worried about security issues, since we already do this by 
> > default and the current behavior can cause problems like stripping XML tags 
> > from a string response!
> >
> > (To see what I mean, just run
> >
> > ```
> > SELECT '<xml>hello</xml>' AS xml;
> > ```
> >
> > in SQL Lab.)
> >
> > I was just wondering if people had different ideas on this. Eg, I always 
> > thought we could/should implement per-column — we could have extra metadata 
> > in the column indicating it should be rendered as HTML, or we could use the 
> > Jinja macro that I suggested.
> >
> > But I'm OK with moving this forward based on lazy consensus without a SIP, 
> > and maybe later we could start a discussion on rich rendering of data, 
> > that's something that would be cool. Rendering images inline, exploding 
> > nested data (structs and arrays) into multiple table cells, that kind of 
> > thing.
> >
> > --Beto
> >
> >
> > > On 3/8/24 11:14 AM, Evan Rusackas wrote:
> > > It may also be worth noting that the current HTML rendering in SQL Lab 
> > > (which can’t be disabled by the user) respects Talisman configs, so it 
> > > can strip out the usual XSS concerns.
> > >
> > > Evan Rusackas
> > > > On Mar 8, 2024 at 9:09 AM -0700, Evan Rusackas <e...@rusackas.com>, 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I’d spoken to Yanisa about this previously. This change was on their 
> > > > list, and I had advised them that this change might be fine with lazy 
> > > > consensus, but if there’s controversy, they could elevate it to a SIP.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > My impression was that it’s not a big significant architectural change 
> > > > or security risk since SQL Lab and other tables in Superset already 
> > > > render HTML by default, so this doesn’t expose any new security risk. 
> > > > This simply gives the user added control over this for certain use 
> > > > cases where you’d want to disable the rendering.
> > > >
> > > > It might warrant some design discussion around the placement of the 
> > > > switch, or where else we might be able to provide similar controls in 
> > > > the future, but I don’t see anything controversial or architecturally 
> > > > dangerous here that would’ve required a SIP. Let me know if I’m missing 
> > > > something, as I may well be :)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Evan Rusackas
> > > > On Mar 8, 2024 at 7:28 AM -0700, Michael S. Molina 
> > > > <michael.s.mol...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> > > > > Hi Yanisa,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for the proposal. As Beto mentioned, the best way to 
> > > > > introduce new features to Superset is through the SIP process where 
> > > > > we can collectively collaborate on the proposal. I bet that during 
> > > > > the SIP review we’ll have many questions about the security 
> > > > > implications of the proposed feature and how it interacts with our 
> > > > > current HTML rendering restrictions.
> > > > >
> > > > > To learn about SIPs, just check the link Beto provided.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Michael S. Molina
> > > > >
> > > > > > On 8 Mar 2024, at 10:44, Beto Dealmeida 
> > > > > > <robe...@dealmeida.net.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do we have a SIP written for this? (see 
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/5602 for context)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Also, did you consider having some kind of macro that would 
> > > > > > indicate to the frontend that the result should be rendered as 
> > > > > > HTML? For example, this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ```
> > > > > > SELECT product, {{ render_html('product_url') }}, price
> > > > > > FROM some_table
> > > > > > ```
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Could generate SQL like this:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ```
> > > > > > SELECT product, '<RENDER>' || product_url || '</RENDER>', price
> > > > > > FROM some_table
> > > > > > ```
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Which would then be detected by the frontend and we'd render 
> > > > > > `product_url` as HTML.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then this could be defined at the column level, and people would be 
> > > > > > able to create derived columns in datasets that are automatically 
> > > > > > rendered as HTML.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --Beto
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 3/7/24 10:56 PM, Treesak, Yanisa (Agoda) wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I hope this email finds you well. I wanted to reach out to 
> > > > > > > propose an idea for enhancing Superset SQLLab's functionality.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Currently, the platform renders any HTML command in the result 
> > > > > > > table, which can sometimes obscure the full HTML in the request 
> > > > > > > body. To address this, I suggest implementing an option button 
> > > > > > > that enables users to control the rendering of HTML in the result 
> > > > > > > table.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This feature would provide users with more flexibility and 
> > > > > > > clarity when viewing HTML content within SQLLab. I believe it 
> > > > > > > could greatly improve the user experience and streamline 
> > > > > > > workflows.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would appreciate your consideration of this proposal and would 
> > > > > > > be happy to discuss it further at your convenience.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you for your time and attention.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *Yanisa Treesak*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Data Engineer
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Agoda Services Co., Ltd.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a *Booking Holdings* company
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This message is confidential and is for the sole use of the
> > > > > > > intended recipient(s). It may also be privileged or
> > > > > > > otherwise protected by copyright or other legal rules. If
> > > > > > > you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply
> > > > > > > email and delete it from your system. It is prohibited to
> > > > > > > copy this message or disclose its content to anyone. Any
> > > > > > > confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost by any
> > > > > > > mistaken delivery or unauthorized disclosure of the message.
> > > > > > > All messages sent to and from Agoda may be monitored to
> > > > > > > ensure compliance with company policies, to protect the
> > > > > > > company's interests and to remove potential malware.
> > > > > > > Electronic messages may be intercepted, amended, lost or
> > > > > > > deleted, or contain viruses.
> > > > > > >
> >

Reply via email to