+1 from me as well to the new aspect configuration. This solves the problem more cleanly.
I'm not clear about one thing. Shall we make this aspect configuration to be a child of other elements like mediators and endpoints or is it a top level configuration only? Thanks, Supun.. On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Ruwan Linton <ruwan.lin...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1, we should go for this, and I think it will be very useful in a > production set up; if anything goes wrong and the admin wants to enable > tracing for the full synapse config he do not have to go onto each and every > config bit. OTOH, if he knows where the issue is he can just enable tracing > of that proxy only. > > Thnaks, > Ruwan > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Hubert, Eric <eric.hub...@foxmobile.com>wrote: > >> Well, actually I thought in the same direction as Ruwan. If introducing >> a global configuration option it should be consistent with the other >> configurations like tracing and statistics. This was one point against >> adding this only for any newly introduced feature like JMX notifications. If >> we would like to use such a configuration option, than we should >> consistently support this also for statistics and tracing. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Hi Ruwan, >> >> I think if we do this the correct way, the way you've suggested is the >> correct way. I was bit reluctant to do that because it is kind of like a >> big change. At least at the conceptual level. >> >> I like your idea and I'll come up with an implementation. >> >> Eric, What do you think? >> >> > > > -- > Ruwan Linton > Technical Lead & Product Manager; WSO2 ESB; http://wso2.org/esb > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org > email: ru...@wso2.com; cell: +94 77 341 3097 > blog: http://ruwansblog.blogspot.com > -- Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc http://wso2.org supunk.blogspot.com
