That sounds good to me.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Luciano,
> >
> > 10 of the 11 artifacts look good to me for LICENSE and NOTICE (as far as
> I
> > can tell they reflect the artifact contents). However the standalone
> > uberjar (systemml-0.10.0-incubating-standalone.jar) does not have the
> > correct LICENSE and NOTICE (one of my commits in the last week must have
> > affected this, since it worked last week such as at commit e2cb4db...).
> >
> > Can we remove this artifact from the release candidate, or is this a
> > showstopper? I have not heard of anyone using this uberjar.
> >
> > Deron
> >
> >
> >
> I would say this is not a blocking, as we were worse on the previous
> release, then we should be ok filing a jira and fixing on the next release.
>

Reply via email to