That sounds good to me.
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Luciano, > > > > 10 of the 11 artifacts look good to me for LICENSE and NOTICE (as far as > I > > can tell they reflect the artifact contents). However the standalone > > uberjar (systemml-0.10.0-incubating-standalone.jar) does not have the > > correct LICENSE and NOTICE (one of my commits in the last week must have > > affected this, since it worked last week such as at commit e2cb4db...). > > > > Can we remove this artifact from the release candidate, or is this a > > showstopper? I have not heard of anyone using this uberjar. > > > > Deron > > > > > > > I would say this is not a blocking, as we were worse on the previous > release, then we should be ok filing a jira and fixing on the next release. >
