On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 6:11 PM, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes I'm also in favor of moving to a 1.0 version for our upcoming release > targeting the Spark 1.x series. Since we'll also be subsequently releasing > a version targeting the Spark 2.x series, I would also like to suggest that > we name that version 2.0. This version naming scheme would allow us to > easily associate a SystemML version with the Spark series that it targets, > thus reducing confusion for a user. Rather than view a 2.0 version as a > successor to 1.0, let's view it instead as simply a naming scheme that > corresponds to the targeted version of Spark. > > So, 1.0 would be our upcoming release targeting Spark 1.x, and 2.0 would > be our upcoming release targeting Spark 2.x. > > + 1
-- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
