fine by me considering that it would be indicative of a stable release. Regards, Berthold Reinwald IBM Almaden Research Center office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com
From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 08/25/2016 03:45 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache SystemML Release 1.0.0 On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I'm still not fully convinced that we need to drop Spark 1.x support, > instead of supporting both 1.x and 2.x. I would appreciate if we could > first conclude the discussion around migrating to Spark 2.0. > > Furthermore, I think that creating a dependency to Spark versioning would > unnecessarily complicate our own release process. I would rather use major > releases as an opportunity to cleanup APIs and drop certain language > features. And this is unlikely to coincide with Spark's releases. From my > perspective it would be even more confusing for a user to release a major > version for a relatively minor change as support for a new Spark version. > > Regards, > Matthias > > I will leave the discussion about Spark 1.x and 2.x for the original thread. Trying to bring the topic back to the original subject, are we in consensus that we could call the next release it SystemML 1.0 ? -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
