I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995 Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still need to be handled here ? On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been resolved - > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC. > > Regards, > Matthias > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. Th]Matthias > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML- > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > ------------------------------ > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open issues > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We should be able > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a new RC > over the weekend. > > Regards, > Matthias > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > ------------------------------ > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support > Matthias added he reverted changes) > > -Arvind > > From: "dusenberr...@gmail.com" <dusenberr...@gmail.com> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for vector > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on SystemML > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on. > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> > wrote: > >> > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature we want > to > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter). > >> > >> Regards, > >> Matthias > > Great progress !!! > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I will > work > > on RC2. > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975> > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/> > > > > > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
