ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too.
Regards,
Matthias
From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org"
<dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue
in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need
resolution for it.
-Arvind
From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From my
> end, we are ready to go.
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there
> is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting
> for
> >
> > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let
> me
> > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which
is
> > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn
tests
> > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but
> we
> > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to
go.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the
following
> > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> https://issues.apache.or
> > > >
> > > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this
thread,
> > > open:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > >
> > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that
still
> need
> > > > to be handled here ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> resolved -
> > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> 10:44:51
> > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update:
SYSTEMML-969
> has
> > > been
> > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open
> > > issues
> > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> should be
> > > able
> > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing
a
> > > new RC
> > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I
> added
> > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF
support
> > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > >
> > > > > -Arvind
> > > > >
> > > > > From: "dusenberr...@gmail.com" <dusenberr...@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > >
> > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance
for
> > > vector
> > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> SystemML
> > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> mbo...@us.ibm.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have
feature
> we
> > > want
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame
converter).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and
I
> > > will
> > > > > work
> > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> lresende1975>
> > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
