The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From my end, we are ready to go.
-Mike -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there is > one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009. > > Regards, > Matthias > > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python failures > still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting for > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2. > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which is > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn tests > > today that I want to look into before we cut. > > > > -Mike > > > > -- > > > > Mike Dusenberry > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but we > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Matthias > > > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the following > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open: https://issues.apache.or > > > > > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, > > open: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993 > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994 > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995 > > > > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still need > > > to be handled here ? > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been resolved - > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. > > Th]Matthias > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has > > been > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML- > > > > > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open > > issues > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We should be > > able > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a > > new RC > > > > over the weekend. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change > > > > > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator. > > apache.org > > > > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes) > > > > > > > > -Arvind > > > > > > > > From: "dusenberr...@gmail.com" <dusenberr...@gmail.com> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for > > vector > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on SystemML > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Mike Dusenberry > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature we > > want > > > > to > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter). > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards, > > > > >> Matthias > > > > > Great progress !!! > > > > > > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I > > will > > > > work > > > > > on RC2. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975> > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > >
