Looks like we are about ready for the next RC. Please let me know if not, otherwise I will try to create a new RC later tonight.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 > -Arvind > > From: "dusenberr...@gmail.com" <dusenberr...@gmail.com> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 6:59 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > +1 for SYSTEMML-951 > > -- > > Mike Dusenberry > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > as the Python DSL is still in experimental status, I don't think that > SYSTEMML-1013 is blocking the release. However, there is one more > nice-to-have performance feature I'd like to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right > indexing via lookup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow once 951 is > in; if somebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include this > too. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > Acs S ---10/05/2016 12:19:57 PM---Imran has opened Jira 1013. -Arvind > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator. > apache.org> > > Date: 10/05/2016 12:19 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > > > Imran has opened Jira 1013. > > -Arvind > > > > From: Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too. > > > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more issue I am aware > of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator. > apache.org> > > Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue > in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need > resolution for it. > > -Arvind > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009. > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From > my > > > end, we are ready to go. > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Mike Dusenberry > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, > there > > > is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python > > > failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am > waiting > > > for > > > > > > > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please > let > > > me > > > > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <dusenberr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, > which is > > > > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn > tests > > > > > today that I want to look into before we cut. > > > > > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Mike Dusenberry > > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, > but > > > we > > > > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to > go. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the > following > > > > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open: > > > https://issues.apache.or > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this > thread, > > > > > open: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993 > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994 > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995 > > > > > > > > > > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that > still > > > need > > > > > > to be handled here ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm < > mbo...@us.ibm.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been > > > resolved - > > > > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016 > > > 10:44:51 > > > > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. > > > > > Th]Matthias > > > > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: > SYSTEMML-969 > > > has > > > > > been > > > > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS > > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The > open > > > > > issues > > > > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We > > > should be > > > > > able > > > > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of > testing a > > > > > new RC > > > > > > > over the weekend. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed > (I > > > added > > > > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> > > > > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" > <dev@systemml.incubator. > > > > > apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF > support > > > > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Arvind > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: "dusenberr...@gmail.com" <dusenberr...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance > for > > > > > vector > > > > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on > > > SystemML > > > > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike Dusenberry > > > > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw > > > > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende < > > > luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm < > > > mbo...@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting > for > > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have > feature > > > we > > > > > want > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame > converter). > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > > > >> Matthias > > > > > > > > Great progress !!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved > and I > > > > > will > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > > on RC2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/ > > > lresende1975> > > > > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* < > http://lresende.blogspot.com/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Luciano Resende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/